Resources

Other relevant sections in the Turing Way

Further resources for practising self-reflection, reflexivity and positionality

Some of these resources refer to qualitative research but are widely applicable to positionality in general.

Further reading on positionality and reflexivity in science

References
  1. McIntosh, P. (1988). White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack. Wellesley College Center for Research on Women. https://admin.artsci.washington.edu/sites/adming/files/unpacking-invisible-knapsack.pdf
  2. Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Daumé III, H., & Crawford, K. (2018). Datasheets for datasets. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1803.09010. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/uploads/prod/2019/01/1803.09010.pdf
  3. Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social identity map: A reflexivity tool for practicing explicit positionality in critical qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. 10.1177/1609406919870075
  4. Holmes, A. G. D. (2020). Researcher Positionality-A Consideration of Its Influence and Place in Qualitative Research-A New Researcher Guide. International Journal of Education, 8(4), 1–10. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1268044.pdf
  5. Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3178066